Strength of Guiding Teams
The strength of the guiding teams assessed by the astronauts that are supposed to follow the leadership provides insights into whether the preconditions are established. The guiding teams are assessed by 5 criteria: 1) are the astronauts even aware about who is part of the guiding teams, (all following criteria are assessed by those who are aware of the guiding team within their domain) 2) power level, 3) the mix of required expertise, 4) credibility, and 5) leadership.
:: Assessing wether people are aware of who is part of the guiding team.
With a 95% awareness score it is fair to say that it is clear within X who are the people leading the data-riven transformation. Which makes the next assessments on this site highly relevant.
Which percentage of people are aware of who is part of the guiding team within their domain
:: Assessing wether the guiding teams are sufficiently powerful.
The power score is with74% fair. It could be improved but the guiding teams should be able to have an impact.
Power score of guiding team (ranked by those that are aware of the guiding team)
:: Assessing wether the guiding teams have the right mix of required expertise combined.
The mix of expertise in the guiding teams is with a score of75% quite good.
Expertise mix score for guiding teams (ranked by those that are aware of the guiding team)
:: Assessing wether the guiding teams has sufficient credibility within the company.
73% as credibility score is fair and a baseline that can be build upon.
Credibility score for guiding teams (ranked by those that are aware of the guiding team)
:: Assessing wether the guiding teams have sufficient leadership skills.
74% as leadership score is high and shows the believe in the ability of the leadership team to have impact. Perhaps this can be further strengthened leveraging the influence of the executives of the program.
Leadership score for guiding teams (ranked by those that are aware of the guiding team)
© OAO 2023 Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions